<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>closedsrc.org &#187; Music</title>
	<atom:link href="http://closedsrc.org/tag/music/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://closedsrc.org</link>
	<description>No one here but us Daleks!</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 18 Jan 2012 07:14:46 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
		<item>
		<title>So Close: Cowon iAudio X7</title>
		<link>http://closedsrc.org/2011/01/so-close-cowon-iaudio-x7/</link>
		<comments>http://closedsrc.org/2011/01/so-close-cowon-iaudio-x7/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 05 Jan 2011 02:14:48 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Linh Pham</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Blog Post]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Cowon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[FLAC]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[iPod]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[MP3 players]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Music]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://closedsrc.org/?p=509</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[A few months ago, I wrote about my search for an iPod Classic replacement and how there isn&#8217;t a whole lot of options out there. Well, I found something that would meets most of my requirements when perusing through The Register. They had a review of a Cowon iAudio X7 portable media player that is [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>A few months ago, I wrote about my <a href="/2010/10/a-better-ipod-classic-replacement/">search for an iPod Classic replacement</a> and how there isn&#8217;t a whole lot of options out there. Well, I found something that would meets most of my requirements when perusing through <a href="http://www.theregister.co.uk/">The Register</a>. They had a <a href="http://www.reghardware.com/2011/01/04/review_pmp_cowon_iaudio_x7/">review</a> of a <a href="http://www.jetaudio.com/products/cowon/X7/"> Cowon iAudio X7 portable media player</a> that is available with either a 120GB or a 160GB hard drive; more importantly, the player supports Ogg Vorbis and FLAC files (albeit, Cowon does not list out support for 16-bit/48KHz FLAC files).</p>
<p>The 160GB capacity would be the same as my current iPod Classic, which is liveable; but, the lack of physical playback buttons (meaning dependance on on-screen controls) is a much bigger issue for me. I wouldn&#8217;t mind having a corded remote that provide some kind of playback control. <span id="more-509"></span>Heck, some of the portable MiniDisc recorders that I have from a quite a while ago included such a remote and even included a small LCD display! No, I am not planning on going back to MiniDiscs for portable music; partially, because I haven&#8217;t charged the Ni-MH batteries in years and, thus not be portable.</p>
<p>The iAudio X7 does have some nice features, including support for stereo output via Bluetooth and FM radio. It also includes a line-in cable so that I can, one day, finish transferring decades-old folk music from tapes to a digital format. Right now, my plan would be to use an old Creative Nomad Jukebox 3 that also has line-in and record each side to a single WAV file. With the Cowon player, I would be limited to a lossy format.</p>
<p>According to Cowon, the player can play audio for up to 103 hours continuously on a full battery. I doubt if that will be the case when playing a large mix of FLAC or MP3 files encoded at 320Kbps. I would be happy if my iPod Classic could last for more than 1.03 minutes on battery! I&#8217;m considering sending in my iPod Classic to a company that will swap out the battery with a new one, as it would be cheaper than sending it to Apple for the same procedure.</p>
<p>Will I be running out to get the Cowon iAudio X7 immediately? No, mostly because I can&#8217;t find anyone selling one in the United States. I still have reservations about the touch screen interface and not excited with the lack of an increase of capacity. Another concern would be in terms of price. Right now, it is available in the UK for £249 and probably would probably cost north of $300-325 once it reaches these shores.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://closedsrc.org/2011/01/so-close-cowon-iaudio-x7/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>A better iPod Classic replacement?</title>
		<link>http://closedsrc.org/2010/10/a-better-ipod-classic-replacement/</link>
		<comments>http://closedsrc.org/2010/10/a-better-ipod-classic-replacement/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 13 Oct 2010 00:05:06 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Linh Pham</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Blog Post]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[FLAC]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[iPod]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Lossless]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[MP3 players]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Music]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://closedsrc.org/?p=305</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Those who know me, I have amassed a huge collection of music over the past decade and a half. So much, in that I don&#8217;t have enough CD towers to store them all. I have also ripped the CDs in MP3 (a bare minimum of 256kbps CBR, though my standard is now 320kbps), as well [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Those who know me, I have amassed a huge collection of music over the past decade and a half. So much, in that I don&#8217;t have enough CD towers to store them all. I have also ripped the CDs in MP3 (a bare minimum of 256kbps CBR, though my standard is now 320kbps), as well as many of my favorites in <a href="http://flac.sourceforge.net/">FLAC</a> and <a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Apple_Lossless">ALAC</a>.</p>
<p>Why FLAC and ALAC? I chose FLAC since it is a lossless and open format, in which I can treat each FLAC file as an archive-worthy copy that so happens to contain ReplayGain data. Not to mention, it&#8217;s perfect for listening to music in my living room through my Squeezebox or one of my Sennheiser headphones (HD570 and HD580). Now, it may seem redundant to have FLAC and ALAC copies floating around, but it&#8217;s necessary because Apple decided to go with ALAC as their sole lossless format for iTunes and their iPods.<span id="more-305"></span></p>
<p>All said, in order to carry around a good selection of music and podcasts (including every <a href="http://waitwait.npr.org/">Wait Wait&#8230; Don&#8217;t Tell Me!</a> show made available as a podcast, <a href="http://www.cartalk.com/">Car Talk</a>, <a href="http://www.thisamericanlife.org/">This American Life</a>), I need something has a storage capacity of at least 120GB. My current 160GB iPod Classic does the deed fairly well&#8230; except for the fact that I can&#8217;t play FLAC files on it (I know about <a href="http://www.rockbox.org/">RockBox</a>, but my iPod Classic is not supported). I&#8217;m also at the point where I would like to carry around more podcasts and more albums in a lossless format, preferably in FLAC format.</p>
<p>So, I&#8217;ve been looking around for a better alternative and one that has a 250GB (or larger) hard drive. Unfortunately, it is slim pickin&#8217;s and not many do a good job of handling dynamic or on-the-go playlists. I know there are flash memory based players out there that can take 32GB Micro-SDHC cards and support FLAC, but that would require a lot of card swapping and would lead to long load times and playlist management nightmare. I&#8217;m kind of dealing with that right now with two 32GB SDHC cards for my S5, but instead of swapping out cards (as the head unit has two SD/SDHC slots), I have to switch between sources and playlists cannot span across slots.</p>
<p>I have also considered giving up on using a lossless format for portable use, but that&#8217;s a compromise that I&#8217;m not willing to make right now. I would really like to make good use of my audio setup in my S5 and &#8220;dumbing&#8221; down to 256kbps MP3 just doesn&#8217;t feel quite right.</p>
<p>I know there isn&#8217;t a huge market for hard drive based portable media players, particularly ones that support FLAC and <a href="http://www.vorbis.com/">Ogg Vorbis</a>. Everything is moving towards flash memory (internal or with swappable memory cards), due to form factor, weight and battery life. Unfortunately, that has the side effect of relatively lower capacity, or moderately large capacity at much higher prices (iPod Touch, anyone?).</p>
<p>Until a better iPod Classic or similar device arrives, I&#8217;ll have to slog around with my iPod Classic and its waning battery.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://closedsrc.org/2010/10/a-better-ipod-classic-replacement/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>1</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Fail: Doctor Who 2010 Series Theme and Intro</title>
		<link>http://closedsrc.org/2010/04/fail-doctor-who-2010-series-theme-and-intro/</link>
		<comments>http://closedsrc.org/2010/04/fail-doctor-who-2010-series-theme-and-intro/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 05 Apr 2010 19:19:42 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Linh Pham</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Archived Blog Post]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Doctor Who]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Music]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://beta.closedsrc.org/?p=134</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[All that I can say is that the new introduction and theme for the new Doctor Who series (Series 5, Series 1, New Series, or whatever it is called) seems to have lost touch with its predecessors. While there still is the TARDIS zooming through the Time Vortex, as seen in Series 1 through 4 (Ninth [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<div>
<p>All that I can say is that the <a rel="nofollow" href="http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=y7df8TWzBlM&amp;feature=related">new introduction and theme for the new Doctor Who series</a> (Series 5, Series 1, New Series, or whatever it is called) seems to  have lost touch with its predecessors. While there still is the TARDIS  zooming through the Time Vortex, as seen in Series 1 through 4 (Ninth  and Tenth Doctors), and the base melody is there; but it does not seem  to have the same depth and oomph as the one for Series 4.</p>
<p>The only thing I like about the new intro is that the TARDIS in the  new logo morphs into the TARDIS and continues to zoom through the time  vortex.</p>
<p>Maybe it will grow on me like the Series 4 theme, but only time will tell.</p>
</div>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://closedsrc.org/2010/04/fail-doctor-who-2010-series-theme-and-intro/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Hands On: Slim Devices Squeezebox v3</title>
		<link>http://closedsrc.org/2007/12/hands-on-slim-devices-squeezebox-v3/</link>
		<comments>http://closedsrc.org/2007/12/hands-on-slim-devices-squeezebox-v3/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 17 Dec 2007 03:16:16 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Linh Pham</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Archived Blog Post]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Hardware]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Music]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Reviews]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Squeezebox]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://beta.closedsrc.org/?p=85</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[As I mentioned in an earlier post, I purchased a Slim Devices Squeezebox (version 3) a couple of weeks ago as a way to get music from my file server out to my living room. Before purchasing the Squeezebox, I connected an iPod dock to my receiver and used one of my iPods to play [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>As I mentioned in an earlier post, I purchased a Slim Devices Squeezebox  (version 3) a couple of weeks ago as a way to get music from my file  server out to my living room. Before purchasing the Squeezebox, I  connected an iPod dock to my receiver and used one of my iPods to play  music. The three biggest problems with that setup is that I had to walk  over to the iPod to skip or repeat songs or change playlists (the cost  of a newer dock and a remote was not worth the cost), it was impossible  to see what song was playing from any other spot than standing in front  of it, and the iPod does not natively play Ogg Vorbis or FLAC audio  tracks.<span id="more-85"></span></p>
<p>I also tried using my XBOX 360 and Playstation 3 consoles to stream  my music, but again, neither natively handle Ogg Vorbis and FLAC audio  tracks. Also, I didn&#8217;t want to have to turn my television on to see what  was playing nor wanted to deal with the not-so-brilliant  IR/line-of-sight Xbox 360 Universal Media Remote.</p>
<p>So I was doing some research and narrowed my search down to the  Squeezebox and the Roku Soundbridge. My choice came down to what audio  formats are supported <strong>natively</strong> by the device, the  overall quality of the unit (both physically and in terms of audio  quality). I also noticed that Slim Devices was discounting the white  wireless Squeezebox by $50, which also with the good reviews of the  unit, clenched it for me. Sure, I don&#8217;t have anything white in my audio  stack, but the rest of my A/V setup is color co-ordinated anyway (my  XBOX 360 and Wii are white, the Playstation 3 and GameCube are black,  the Super Nintendo, original NES, the front of the XBOX 360 HD-DVD drive  and the Playstation are shades of gray, and I have a gold Nintendo 64).</p>
<p>After a couple of days, I received the Squeezebox and started the  setup process by installing the Slim Server software on my file server  running FreeBSD (which was as simple as running &#8220;portinstall  slimserver&#8221;). Once the software was installed, I created a DHCP  reservation and DNS entry for the device, then started the setup process  on the Squeezebox itself. Once I entered in the information for my  wireless network using WPA2 Personal (if I had a long enough network  cable and a spare switch port, I would have connected it to my wired  network), it picked up the Slim Server and was ready to go.</p>
<p>At first, I decided to connect the Squeezebox to the external DSP  using a digital coax cable, had the Slim Server scan a couple of my  albums and concert DVDs in FLAC format, then started playing the songs.  The overall volume was a bit quieter than the audio coming out of the  line out from my iPod, which I was able to control decently with the  external DSP. But after skipping through a couple of songs, I noticed  that the DSP had made some clicking noises. After some testing, I  noticed that it would happen when transitioning between songs with  different sample rates (audio CDs have a sample rate of 44.1KHz while  the concert DVDs that I had converted to FLAC all use a sample rate of  48KHz). Also, there was a fair amount of white noise that was introduced  by the DSP, which was a bit annoying during quiet spots, which is not a  fault of the Squeezebox, so I am not dinging it for that in any way.</p>
<p>So I unplugged the audio cable for my iPod dock to the receiver and  plugged in my Squeezebox over analog. Again, the volume coming out of  the Squeezebox was a tad low, but workable (I just need to remember to  lower the volume before switching over to the FM tuner for listening to  OPB, but more on that later). The audio quality using the analog output  was very close to the digital outpiut, just without the extra white  noise introduced by the DSP.</p>
<p>The included remote has a very nice feel to it, the buttons have a  nice and subtle tactic feel when pressed and does not require absolute  line-of-sight in order for it to work. Even though the remote is quite  nice, the web interface for the Slim Server is absolutely great. The  Fishbone skin provides a detachable window that shows the &#8220;Now Playing&#8221;  information, in addition to volume controls and basic controls for  skipping, stopping and pausing. Of course, I don&#8217;t need to use the web  interface often to see what is currently playing, as the display on the  Squeezebox itself is readable from almost any distance. I even decided  to mimick the product shots on Slim Devices web site by adding Pink  Martini&#8217;s Veronique to the Now Playing playlist :)</p>
<p><strong>Product Shot:</strong></p>
<div id="attachment_89" class="wp-caption alignnone" style="width: 310px"><img class="size-medium wp-image-89" title="Squeezebox Product Shot" src="http://beta.closedsrc.org/wp-content/uploads/2010/09/full-squeezebox-pmveronique-300x142.png" alt="Squeezebox playing Pink Martini's &quot;Veronique&quot;" width="300" height="142" /><p class="wp-caption-text">Squeezebox playing Pink Martini&#39;s &quot;Veronique&quot;</p></div>
<p>The web interface is where the bulk of the configuration, music  management and additional features are presented and managed. Once the  Slim Server is told where to look for music and scans the files, you can  browse through the music by artist, album, genre and year, as well as  browsing the directory structure. You can also use it to configure the  various Random playing options, which provides the ability to include or  exclude genres (I don&#8217;t exactly want one of my Car Talk podcast tracks  to play in the middle of a decent mix set).</p>
<p><strong>Slim Server Web Interface:</strong></p>
<div id="attachment_88" class="wp-caption alignnone" style="width: 310px"><img class="size-medium wp-image-88  " title="Slim Server Web Interface" src="http://beta.closedsrc.org/wp-content/uploads/2010/09/full-slimserver-pmveronique-300x231.png" alt="Web interface for the Squeezebox and Slim Server" width="300" height="231" /><p class="wp-caption-text">Web interface for the Squeezebox and Slim Server</p></div>
<p>In order to limit the amount of music that is scanned and presented  to the Slim Server, I created a basic directory structure on my file  server and used symlinks to point to directories or individual files  that I want to be scanned. Else, I would probably have numerous  duplicates (since I have some CDs and concert DVDs copied in MP3 and  FLAC format, and some on ALAC format as well; even though I split out  each format in their own directory; i.e.: storage/MP3s, storage/FLAC,  storage/ALAC). Up until recently, I didn&#8217;t &#8220;tag&#8221; my FLAC files with  album art, so I placed an image file in each album directory and  configured the Slim Server to look for that filename).</p>
<p>As I hinted to earlier, I use my Squeezebox to listen to OPB Radio  and other Internat radio stations streamed over the Internet (though it  does not seem to play the OPB Music stream, which is a slight  disappointment). The audio quality for streaming Internet radio is  dependent on the quality of the stream itself, with the OPB Radio stream  coming close to the FM channel for most programs (music programs like  &#8220;Thistle and Shamrock&#8221; and others are a bit lackluster due to the low  bitrate).</p>
<p>In terms of audio file formats, it was able to play my music  collection that I copied from my CDs in MP3 format with varying bitrates  (256kbps CBR, 320kbps CBR, 260-280kbps ABR/VBR), all of the FLAC files  that I have, as well as decode several albums in Apple Lossless Audio  Codec (which I transcoded from the FLAC files I have so I can at least  have decent audio quality for my iPod while at work) after I installed  the appropriate decoder package. There has not any problems with  streaming the audio over my wireless network yet, as the signal quality  stays within the 60-75% signal strength zone.</p>
<p>Would I go back to using my iPod, XBOX 360 or Playstation 3 as music  players or streamers in my living room again? No (unless if I start  building an SACD collection), as the Squeezebox has been able to handle  everything that I have thrown at it (with the one exception of the OPB  Music stream).</p>
<p>Was it worth the discounted $249 price? Absolutely! Even if the $50  discount was available on the white wireless model, I would have paid  the regular $299 price.</p>
<p>It isn&#8217;t without its quirks though, I&#8217;ve had the Now Playing track  display not update both on the Squeezebox and in the web interface when  it switches to a new song. Also, the Slim Server software does not  natively handle &#8220;smart&#8221; playlists so that I can build out playlists by  artists or genres.</p>
<p>Of course, during the past couple of weeks, I have been re-copying  the CDs and concert DVDs that I listen to often into 320kbps CBR and  FLAC format, the former for iPod and the latter for the Squeezebox and  the digital jukebox in my car&#8230; which leads to figuring out if there  are any more CDs that I should have in FLAC format, etc.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://closedsrc.org/2007/12/hands-on-slim-devices-squeezebox-v3/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Additions to the List of Depressing Songs</title>
		<link>http://closedsrc.org/2007/12/additions-to-the-list-of-depressing-songs/</link>
		<comments>http://closedsrc.org/2007/12/additions-to-the-list-of-depressing-songs/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 03 Dec 2007 01:25:31 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Linh Pham</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Archived Blog Post]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Depressing Songs]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Depression]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Music]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://beta.closedsrc.org/?p=109</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Having been blue over the past several days, it gave me a chance to expand the list of depressing songs and why I find them depressing. The new additions include: Matchbox Twenty: Unwell and Bed of Lies Lifehouse: Everything As well as a couple of songs by Barenaked Ladies. Now that I have a Squeezebox [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<div>
<p>Having been blue over the past several days, it gave me a chance to expand the list of <a rel="nofollow" href="http://closedsrc.org/depressing-songs">depressing songs</a> and why I find them depressing. The new additions include:</p>
<ul>
<li>Matchbox Twenty: <a href="/2007/12/matchbox-twenty-unwell/"><em>Unwell</em></a> and <a href="/2007/12/matchbox-twenty-bed-of-lies/"><em>Bed of Lies</em></a></li>
<li>Lifehouse: <a href="/2007/12/lifehouse-everything/"><em>Everything</em></a></li>
</ul>
<p>As well as a couple of songs by <a href="/2007/11/depressing-songs-barenaked-ladies/">Barenaked Ladies</a>.</p>
<p>Now that I have a <a rel="nofollow" href="http://www.slimdevices.com/pi_squeezebox.html">Squeezebox</a> in the living room, it is much easier to queue up depressing songs  on-demand. At this point, I do not know if that is a blessing or a  curse. (by the way, a brief review of the device is coming up in the  next week or two.)</p>
</div>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://closedsrc.org/2007/12/additions-to-the-list-of-depressing-songs/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>

